Build a 9:1 pulley system with a Jigger

Build a 9:1 pulley system with a Jigger

Something I am always looking to do is find new ways to make gear more useful.

For rescue one of the great tools in the toolkit is the jigger (aka set-of-fours). This is a pre-constructed pulley system made, in this instance, with two double pulleys. It has a set mechanical advantage of 4:1 simple(s) with a change of direction (CD) or a 5:1s.

A 4:1sCD (left) or 5:1s (right) can be useful pulley systems for various tasks. For example, we could use the Jigger as a bolt-on pulley system (shown above). However, the Jigger used for rescue hauling in a backcountry context may not be enough as you have a small number of haulers and limited equipment. In other words, you need a bit more work out of the pulley system.

Making the Jigger more useful

So how can we convert this tool into a 9:1 so it’s more valuable for backcountry rescue?

  1. Attach a rope to the load.
  2. With the rope build a progress capture on your anchor ­– something efficient, your choice.
  3. Attach a rope grab onto your load line and another on the line coming out of the progress capture.
  4. Attach the Jigger in between the two rope grabs and you are ready to haul.

Notes

  • In effect, you are pulling the rope grabs together.
  • You can rig the Jigger in either direction and it will still be a 9:1.
  • One end is a 4:1, the other is a 5:1 and they join at the load end Prusik to become a 9:1 (i.e. the mechanical advantages are added together).
  • The pulley system is a 9:1 complex (cx) i.e. it’s not a simple or compound, therefore it’s a complex.

Related Posts

webbing anchor header
Anchors

Is 16mm webbing strong enough for rescue?

The post tackles a practical question for backcountry rescue teams: is 16mm tubular webbing strong enough for anchor rigging, given the appeal of reducing weight in a rescue kit? To find out, the team ran a series of pull tests comparing different wrap-and-pull configurations — Wrap 1 Pull 1, Wrap 2 Pull 2, Wrap 2 Pull 1, and Wrap 3 Pull 2 — across several real-world surfaces: pins, carabiners, smooth rock, sharp rock, and edge-protected sharp rock. A baseline was first established using 25mm webbing before switching to the thinner 16mm webbing to see how it held up.

Read More »
Friction

Does a smaller radius have more friction?

The post tackles a common assumption in rope work: that a smaller-radius device — a carabiner, mallion rapide, or belay device — produces more friction on a rope than a larger one, since the rope is thought to have more internal resistance as the radius decreases. To find out if this holds up, the team ran friction tests comparing stainless steel mallion rapides at 12mm, 10mm, 8mm, and 7mm, all using the same 8mm static rope. The results are checked against the Capstan Equation, which doesn’t include radius as a factor in the first place.

Read More »

Get the
top 5 rescue
checklist

Moments away

Want to be ready for rescue?

Get clarity, organised and practised