Pulley versus carabiner efficiency

Pulley versus carabiner efficiency.

It’s always a good idea to be prepared for self-rescue when you are out and about climbing, caving, canyoning, or mountaineering. Make sure the gear you have can do the job and you have tried it out.

One question that comes up is: Can I use carabiners (to save weight) instead of pulleys for a rescue raising system?

The main issue is friction. I did some quick look testing so you can gain an understanding of pulley versus carabiner efficiency.

1. The gear

Kordas Static Rope (9mm Dana)

Petzl mini pulley (sheave diameter of 25mm)

CT alloy carabiner (10mm stock)

Rock Exotica Enforcer (load cell accurate to 0.02kN increments)

Bag with a mass of 10kg (0.1kN)

2. Test procedure

Connected everything up

Pulled steadily on the load cell with my hand

5 tests on each

Recorded the max load

3. Carabiner results

Test 1: 0.2kN

Test 2: 0.18kN

Test 3: 0.18kN

Test 4: 0.18kN

Test 5: 0.2kN

Average 0.188

Efficiency 53%

3. Pulley results

Test 1: 0.12kN

Test 2: 0.12kN

Test 3: 0.12kN

Test 4: 0.12kN

Test 5: 0.12kN

Average 0.12

Efficiency 83%

Conclusions

The test results confirmed what I felt. The load was much easier to get moving with the pulley and much harder with the carabiner.

If you expect short hauls of not much load then a carabiner can work.

If you expect longer hauls then consider having a pulley on your harness.

If you are a small person trying to haul a larger person then you need pulleys.

One concept is that if everyone in your group carries 1 small ball bearing pulley you can combine resources and create a rescue raising system when needed.

Plan for likely scenarios, try out your system and carry the right gear.

By Grant Prattley, Over The Edge Rescue, 2016

Two-Point Anchor Angles: The Simple Trig Behind the Rules

Two-Point Anchor Angles: The Simple Trig Behind The Rules Most rope courses teach an anchor angle rule. The usual version

Anchors

Is 16mm webbing strong enough for rescue?

The post tackles a practical question for backcountry rescue teams: is 16mm tubular webbing strong enough for anchor rigging, given the appeal of reducing weight in a rescue kit? To find out, the team ran a series of pull tests comparing different wrap-and-pull configurations — Wrap 1 Pull 1, Wrap 2 Pull 2, Wrap 2 Pull 1, and Wrap 3 Pull 2 — across several real-world surfaces: pins, carabiners, smooth rock, sharp rock, and edge-protected sharp rock. A baseline was first established using 25mm webbing before switching to the thinner 16mm webbing to see how it held up.

Friction

Does a smaller radius have more friction?

The post tackles a common assumption in rope work: that a smaller-radius device — a carabiner, mallion rapide, or belay device — produces more friction on a rope than a larger one, since the rope is thought to have more internal resistance as the radius decreases. To find out if this holds up, the team ran friction tests comparing stainless steel mallion rapides at 12mm, 10mm, 8mm, and 7mm, all using the same 8mm static rope. The results are checked against the Capstan Equation, which doesn’t include radius as a factor in the first place.